Starting parallel pool (parpool) using the 'local' profile ...
Connected to the parallel pool (number of workers: 4).
+ Preprocessing
+ Modeling the optimization problem
- Constructing decision variables
+ Running the optimization solver
Analyzing and transferring files to the workers ...done.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 180, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 198, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 216, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 234, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 252, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 270, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 288, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 306, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 324, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 342, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 360, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 378, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 396, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 414, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 432, meets the tolerances.
- Updated best found solution, cost: 306
- Evaluating new solution: cost 304, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 304, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 301, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 305, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 305, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 301, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 299, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 299, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 296, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 299, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 291, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 296, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 299, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 300, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 296, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 301, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 303, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 299, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 304, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 300, meets the tolerances.
- Updated best found solution, cost: 304
- Updated best found solution, cost: 301
- Updated best found solution, cost: 299
- Updated best found solution, cost: 296
- Updated best found solution, cost: 291
- Evaluating new solution: cost 280, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 287, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 288, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 287, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 283, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 283, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 262, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 283, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 282, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 288, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 289, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 288, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 290, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 281, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 286, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 287, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 284, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 282, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 285, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 277, meets the tolerances.
- Updated best found solution, cost: 280
- Updated best found solution, cost: 277
- Evaluating new solution: cost 272, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 266, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 269, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 271, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 274, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 275, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 274, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 275, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 276, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 271, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 267, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 270, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 272, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 264, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 265, does not meet the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 269, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 270, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 269, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 276, meets the tolerances.
- Evaluating new solution: cost 274, meets the tolerances.
- Updated best found solution, cost: 272
- Updated best found solution, cost: 266
+ Optimization has finished.
- Neighborhood search complete.
- Maximum number of iterations completed.
+ Fixed-point implementation that met the tolerances found.
- Total cost: 266
- Maximum absolute difference: 0.087035
- Use the explore method of the result to explore the implementation.