adding all fields of a structures

7 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
Sonali
Sonali 2023 年 11 月 1 日
編集済み: Matt J 2023 年 11 月 1 日
I have a following structure with fields:
say, my_struct = struct with fields:
bin_1: [851×19 table]
bin_2: [868×19 table]
bin_3: [164×19 table]
bin_4: [104×19 table]
bin_5: [348×19 table]
bin_6: [406×19 table]
bin_7: [303×19 table]
bin_8: [323×19 table]
bin_9: [275×19 table]
bin_10: [110×19 table]
I want to have a structure with one field that is all field combined together. Something like my_new_struct= bin_1: [3500(approx.)×19 table]
i.e. my_new_struct= sum of all tables of my_struct
Could someone help me with the program for that?
  1 件のコメント
Stephen23
Stephen23 2023 年 11 月 1 日
This is fragile data design: as Voss correctly pointed out, the order of fields may not be the order you expect or require. The cause is because you have hidden meta-data (i.e. pseudo indices) in the fieldnames. Much better data design would use actual indices (rather then pseudo-indices) e.g. in a simple structure array or a cell array. That also significantly simplifies the code required to merge all of the tables:
vertcat(C{:}) % from a cell array
vertcat(S.F) % from a structure array
Better data design leads to much better code.

サインインしてコメントする。

回答 (3 件)

Matt J
Matt J 2023 年 11 月 1 日
編集済み: Matt J 2023 年 11 月 1 日
Tables=arrayfun(@(f)mystruct.(f) ,"bin_"+(1:10) ,'uni',0);
my_new_struct.Bin=vertcat(Tables{:});
  2 件のコメント
Dyuman Joshi
Dyuman Joshi 2023 年 11 月 1 日
編集済み: Dyuman Joshi 2023 年 11 月 1 日
Using fieldnames would be better imo.
Matt J
Matt J 2023 年 11 月 1 日
編集済み: Matt J 2023 年 11 月 1 日
If they are the only fields present, and in the order shown, then yes, fieldnames would probably be better.

サインインしてコメントする。


Voss
Voss 2023 年 11 月 1 日
Here's one way to do that:
% a structure like your "my_struct", but with only 3 fields:
my_struct = struct( ...
'bin_1',array2table(repmat("bin_1_data",2,2)), ...
'bin_2',array2table(repmat("bin_2_data",4,2)), ...
'bin_3',array2table(repmat("bin_3_data",3,2)))
my_struct = struct with fields:
bin_1: [2×2 table] bin_2: [4×2 table] bin_3: [3×2 table]
% combine all the tables:
C = structfun(@(x){x},my_struct);
T = vertcat(C{:})
T = 9×2 table
Var1 Var2 ____________ ____________ "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data"
However, that may not combine the tables in the order you wanted. In order to impose an order, you can do something like this:
% get the names of the fields:
fn = fieldnames(my_struct);
% reorder them somehow:
% fn = sort(fn); % sorted lexicographically
% fn = natsort(fn) % sorted by the number they contain
fn = fn(end:-1:1); % reverse
% combine all the tables in that order:
C = cellfun(@(f)my_struct.(f),fn,'UniformOutput',false);
T = vertcat(C{:})
T = 9×2 table
Var1 Var2 ____________ ____________ "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_3_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_2_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data" "bin_1_data"
See natsort in the File Exchange, which may give you the ordering you're after in this case.

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong 2023 年 11 月 1 日
編集済み: Bruno Luong 2023 年 11 月 1 日
s.bin_1=array2table(rand(2,3));
s.bin_2=array2table(rand(3,3));
s.bin_3=array2table(rand(4,3));
c=struct2cell(s);
newstruct.T = cat(1,c{:});
disp(newstruct.T)
Var1 Var2 Var3 _______ ________ _______ 0.90585 0.16903 0.21998 0.6887 0.44019 0.43033 0.3722 0.79743 0.50584 0.64057 0.40379 0.56822 0.14505 0.4095 0.27283 0.71969 0.053031 0.60168 0.67643 0.2598 0.83108 0.17963 0.71627 0.46944 0.77515 0.42908 0.429

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeStructures についてさらに検索

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by