# How to implement a formula involving several elements of the same vector?

1 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
FW 2019 年 9 月 23 日
コメント済み: Shubham Gupta 2019 年 9 月 23 日
Suppose we have two row vectors
Time = [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10];
width= [0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0]; % width of peaks
There is a formula for peak resolution = (t2-t1)/(2*(w2+w1)), where t2 is element of Time(1,2) and t1 is element of Time(1,1). Similarly, w1 and w2 correspond to elements width(1,1) and width(1,2) respectively. With that one should be able to generate a row vector with 9 elements instead of individually calculating those nine values. In such cases how should we implement a formula involving several elements of the same vector?
Could someone also point out an intermediate level reference which discusses the sytax for operating on several elements of the same row or column vector to produce another vector of different dimension such as in this case? Thanks.

#### 0 件のコメント

サインイン to comment.

### 採用された回答

Shubham Gupta 2019 年 9 月 23 日

There are several way to do this, but most basic would be to use 'for' loop to get the feeling of how Matrix indexing works:
PeakResolution = zeros(1,length(Time)-1)
for i = 1:length(Time)-1
PeakResolution(i) = (Time(i+1)-Time(i))/(2*(width(i+1)+width(i)));
end
Once you get the feel of it, you can use functions or inline indexing to make your work easy. For e.g. to calculate difference between consecutive elements can be achieved using 'diff'. So, numerators for peak resolution can be written as:
PeakResolution_num = diff(Time); % diff function
% or
PeakResolution_num = Time(2:end)-Time(1:end-1); % inline indexing
and to take mean of consecutive numbers you can use movmean (only for matlab version above 2016a), so denominators become :
PeakResolution_den = movmean(width,[0,1])*2; % movmean function
PeakResolution_den(end) = [];
% or
PeakResolution_den = (width(2:end) + width(1:end-1)) % inline indexing
Now, you can simply use division to calculate PeakResolution:
PeakResolution = PeakResolution_num./(2*PeakResolution_den);
I hope it helps !

#### 5 件のコメント

Shubham Gupta 2019 年 9 月 23 日
What was the purpose of first defining zeros for the PeakResolution?
When we know the size of the output array, we predefine the variable to prelocate memory for that memory, which helps in code to be executed little bit faster.
Using the same line of reasoning and using a 'for" loop, can we do averaging of two adjacent values such as in a new vector Average?
Yes, you should be able to achieve this easily using 'for' loop. Since, you want to skip the indeces you can define the vector used by for in a similar way :
Average = zeros(1, length(width)/2);
for i = 1:2:length(width)-1
Average((i+1)/2) = (width(i)+width(i+1))/2;
end
Here when I defined
i = 1:2:length(width)-1
I am skipping every even number from 1 to length(width). Also, note that I have maniputed "i" for 'Average' so that it starts from 1 and ends at length(width)/2.
Let me know if you have further questions.
FW 2019 年 9 月 23 日
Thanks. If we parse the notation i = 1:2:length(width)-1, it means index value of width vector starting from 1, with a step size of 2, and ending at length(width)-1.
This means indices corresponding to 1, 3, 5, 7, (10-1) = 1,3, 5, 7, 9.
Is this correct?
width= [0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0]; % Bolded and normal text as pairs to be averaged.
Shubham Gupta 2019 年 9 月 23 日
Yes, this should work as you have mentioned !

サインイン to comment.

### その他の回答 (1 件)

madhan ravi 2019 年 9 月 23 日

peak_resolution = (Time(2:end)-Time(1:end-1))./...
(2*(Width(2:end)+Width(1:end-1))) % if understood correctly
doc colon
doc end

#### 1 件のコメント

FW 2019 年 9 月 23 日
Thanks Ravi.

サインイン to comment.

サインイン してこの質問に回答します。

R2019a

Translated by