- Do you have a parallel pool open? I.e. created using parpool, or automatically? If no pool is open then a parfor loop will not be run in parallel anyway.
- Don't use parfor.
Why accessing 2d matrix in parfor so slow?
1 回表示 (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
Let's say I have a large matrix A:
A = rand(10000,10000);
The following serial code took around 0.5 seconds
tic
for i=1:5
r=9999*rand(1);
disp(A(round(r)+1, round(r)+1))
end
toc
Whereas the following code with parfor took around 47 seconds
tic
parfor i=1:5
r=9999*rand(1);
disp(A(round(r)+1, round(r)+1))
end
toc
How can I speed this up?
0 件のコメント
回答 (1 件)
Stephen23
2018 年 8 月 9 日
編集済み: Stephen23
2018 年 8 月 9 日
"How can I speed this up?"
Why do you think that parfor should be faster? The only time that parfor is faster is when the time saved doing the operations in parallel is greater than the overhead required. This topic has been discussed many time on this forum, which also suggest possible improvements to your code:
This is also explained in the documentation:
Your loop contains very fast commands anyway, mostly just round and indexing, so it is quite possible that you will not see any benefit from parfor.
0 件のコメント
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で Parallel for-Loops (parfor) についてさらに検索
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!