フィルターのクリア

"Input parser" vs. new "arguments" definition

28 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
Stefan Sp.
Stefan Sp. 2022 年 1 月 17 日
編集済み: Stephen23 2023 年 6 月 26 日
R2019b introduced the new "arguments" section for function argument checking and parsing.
I hahe written some functions using the "old" input parser class. Are there any advantages to switch to the new syntax?
Is it worth to update my functions to the new syntax? (sure, I know, "never change a running system")
regards, Stefan
  1 件のコメント
chicken vector
chicken vector 2023 年 4 月 7 日
Hi Stefan, this is a question of great interest.
Have you figured out an answer yet? I am implementing a library and I can't choose what to use.

サインインしてコメントする。

回答 (1 件)

埃博拉酱
埃博拉酱 2023 年 4 月 7 日
編集済み: 埃博拉酱 2023 年 4 月 7 日
The biggest advantage of the arguments block is readability, but it is far less flexible than varargin. People who are not familiar with your code can quickly understand your parameter requirements through the arguments block.
Another potential advantage may be ease of compiler optimization. Overly flexible varargin is difficult to optimize for performance.
  4 件のコメント
Simon
Simon 2023 年 6 月 26 日
I have the same question. Both inputParser and arguments are unfamiliar to me.
Stephen23
Stephen23 2023 年 6 月 26 日
編集済み: Stephen23 2023 年 6 月 26 日
@chicken vector: you can always use a comma-separated list, which works on every MATLAB version**:
options = {"parameters1", 1, "parameter2", 'foo', "parameter3", true}
myfunction(requiredInput, options{:})
** with cell arrays. AFAIK comma-separated lists were introduced at the same time.

サインインしてコメントする。

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeArgument Definitions についてさらに検索

製品


リリース

R2019b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by