The Treebagger give different results in 2012a and 2013a

1 回表示 (過去 30 日間)
xq
xq 2013 年 4 月 19 日
I used
B = TreeBagger(NTrees(j),train_feats',train_labels');
and
Y = predict(B,test_feats');
to classification, in train_feats each column is a sample,the train_labels total of 30 categories,label from 0 to 29.
when I run the code in matlab 2012a the accuracy almost 90%,but when i update to 2013a the accuracy is less than 1%. The data and the code are intact, why the result is so different?
Does anyone have an explanation?

採用された回答

Tom Lane
Tom Lane 2013 年 4 月 23 日
This might be the explanation, and it includes a suggestion of how to avoid the problem:
http://www.mathworks.com/support/bugreports/927692
  1 件のコメント
xq
xq 2013 年 4 月 23 日
Thank you so much for your answer and advice. The answer is exactly the problem. I change the labels from ordinals to chars:
NewLabels{i} = num2str(labels(i));
problem solved!
Thank you again for your help.

サインインしてコメントする。

その他の回答 (0 件)

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeClassification Ensembles についてさらに検索

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by