Reason for Histogram Equalisation for having "stacked" effects?
2 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
I read in an image, run histeq on the it and store it as Img2. Then I run histeq again on Img2 and store it as Img3.
It turns out that when I compare the histograms of Img2 and Img3, the histogram of Img3 looks more equalised and uniform. Both Img2 and Img3, however, look almost identical with naked eyes.
This is a screenshot of their histograms. The one on the left is the histogram for Img2, while the right one is for Img3:
So it looks like the histogram equalisation can be "stacked" and by running many times can make the image even more uniform? Is there a reason for this?
0 件のコメント
採用された回答
Image Analyst
2013 年 2 月 11 日
What was your second input argument to histeq()?
4 件のコメント
Image Analyst
2013 年 2 月 12 日
Let's take a step back and figure out why you want to do histogram equalization anyway. Almost always it's unnecessary to the subsequent processing and analysis, and produces a lousy, unnatural looking image.
その他の回答 (0 件)
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で Histograms についてさらに検索
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!