vectorizing or speeding looped code
1 回表示 (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
i am trying to speed up some code with multiple functions and have found the one that takes the most time (it is all a converted fortran code). it runs a nested for loop 4 times (each with modified input). i've had some success elsewhere in the code eliminating slow points but this one just cant get right. any ideas? (in 2016b for compatability reasons)
for II= 1:N
XP(1)= 1.0D0;
for JJ=2:IORD1
XP(JJ)=XP(JJ-1)*double(A1(II));
end
for JJ= 1:IORD1
for KK= 1:IORD1
B(JJ,KK)=B(JJ,KK)+XP(JJ)*XP(KK);
end
C(JJ)=C(JJ)+XP(JJ)*A2(II);
end
end
0 件のコメント
回答 (3 件)
Turlough Hughes
2020 年 9 月 22 日
This should help, though I've already made assumptions about the sizes of arrays. How many rows/columns are in each variable?
XP(1) = 1;
for II= 1:N
XP(2:end) = XP(1:end-1)*double(A1(II));
B = B + XP(:).*XP(:).';
C = C + XP*A2(II);
end
2 件のコメント
Turlough Hughes
2020 年 9 月 22 日
Did the code work?
Some questions: is XP a column vector/row vector? Does A2 have as many elements as XP? Also, does B contain IORD1 rows and columns? Similarly does C have IORD1 elements?
Paul Schenk
2020 年 9 月 22 日
2 件のコメント
Turlough Hughes
2020 年 9 月 23 日
Vectorisation is usually faster but not always. Probably best to just provide a minimum working example (google it) of code that I (or others) can test and profile. Otherwise it really is just guess work.
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で Operating on Diagonal Matrices についてさらに検索
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!