# Problem of finding lag when using xcorr

26 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
Zhikun Wang 2019 年 11 月 11 日

Hi everyone,
Thank ou for your watching! I have some problem in using xcorr. Basically I have two groups of data, group1 follows the function sin(x) and group2 follows the function sin(x+3/50). The x region is from 0 to 2 and sampling frequency is 100 (201 dots in total). I can see the lags clearly through the function equation and the plot out, but when I try to use the xcorr to find the lags, the maximum always occurs at the center of the output matrix, which means the lag equals to zero. Is there anyway to solve this problem?
I find someone who has the same problem with me, but his data is a group of data close to a mean value, the method mentions in that page doesn'r work in my case.
Best,
Zhikun

サインインしてコメントする。

### 回答 (3 件)

Daniel M 2019 年 11 月 12 日
Yes, running this gives a max lag at 0. That is indicating that y matches x the best in their current positions. Shifting y by any value will make it agree less. You're expecting to see a lag of 3/50 = 0.06 right? (This is equal to 6 samples).
clearvars
clc
close all
fs = 100;
t = 0:1/fs:2;
x = sin(t);
y = sin(t + 3/50);
[r1,lagsy] = xcorr(x,y);
[mr1,locmaxy] = max(r1);
lagsy(locmaxy)/fs
% ans = 0
y2 = circshift(y,6); % shift it by 6 samples
[r2,lagsy2] = xcorr(x,y2);
[mr2,locmaxy2] = max(r2);
lagsy2(locmaxy2)/fs
% ans = 0
% Plot the results
figure
plot(t,x,t,y,t,y2,'k--')
legend('x','y','y2','location','southeast')
Notice that mr1 > mr2. Look at the plot of y2. It's easy to see that any shift of y would lead to less correlation with x than the original signal.
HOWEVER, if you allow the oscillations to go through one full period, then yes, you get the correct value of 0.06.
clearvars
clc
close all
fs = 100;
t = 0:1/fs:2*pi;
x = sin(t);
y = sin(t + 3/50);
[r1,lagsy] = xcorr(x,y);
[mr1,locmaxy] = max(r1);
lagsy(locmaxy)/fs
% ans = 0.06
##### 4 件のコメント2 件の古いコメントを表示2 件の古いコメントを非表示
Zhikun Wang 2019 年 11 月 13 日
Yes. Actually that segment of real data just "looks like" a sin wave but not. What I want to figure out it's the time delay from two diffraction intensity result. I will see the link you attached to figure out if it helps or not. Thanks again for your kindness and wish you have good at the rest of the day!
Best,
Zhikun
Daniel M 2019 年 11 月 16 日
Well I can't provide a more specific answer unless you ask a more specific question. If you uploaded some data along with some examples of your expected outputs then I can try to help.

サインインしてコメントする。

Linas Svilainis 2019 年 12 月 2 日
Yes, essential problem is that signal is sampled wrong. Majority of signal processing techniques assume periodical signal (especially xcorr). Try to make several copies of your signal fragment and put them next to each other-does your real signal looks like this? Probably not.
1.Try to increase the sampling range.
2. Try using subsample delay estimation:
if you will combine 1 and 2 results should be acceptable
##### 1 件のコメント-1 件の古いコメントを表示-1 件の古いコメントを非表示
Zhikun Wang 2019 年 12 月 5 日
Thanks for your advice! I will try that to see if it works.

サインインしてコメントする。

Linas Svilainis 2019 年 12 月 5 日
Of course, it would be helpfull to increase the record length first, if possible.

サインインしてコメントする。

### カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeCorrelation and Convolution についてさらに検索

### Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by