Mapping toolbox VS GMT/Matlab Toolbox

9 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
Jose Cordero
Jose Cordero 2019 年 6 月 23 日
コメント済み: Marco Liberatore 2020 年 4 月 17 日
I am a GIS student and I have just started using the Mapping toolbox. I find it really useful for my needs. There is the GMT toolbox, which is pretty popular in the academicsb , that it is now also available in Matlab. It seems to be very complete and powerful. So, compared to the original Mapping Toolbox, which one is more convenient or useful?
Thanks in advance
  1 件のコメント
Marco Liberatore
Marco Liberatore 2020 年 4 月 17 日
Hi, I'm just reading now your question. I use both GMT (on linux) and the MATLAB Mapping Toolbox and I think that the map quality on gmtis better, I mean in a purely aesthetic sense. The Mapping Toolbox on matlab I think has many limitations. Just for example to zoom in and out in the matlab figure you have many weird effects with the sizes of the window and the coordinate frame.
The gmt toolbox it's a great idea, you can use the powerful and easier matlab to organize your data and then you can use gmt just to plot them. It would be great but actually this toolbox works really bad to me (if you have a better experience let me know!). This toolbox would be also very useful to start a share between who uses GMT and the ones using MATLAB... I don't know how is the situation to your place, but to me there are these two opposite parties!
Marco

サインインしてコメントする。

回答 (0 件)

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeCreating, Deleting, and Querying Graphics Objects についてさらに検索

タグ

製品


リリース

R2019a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by