How to calculate accuracy for neural network algorithms?

4 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
sandhya sandhya
sandhya sandhya 2019 年 3 月 14 日
コメント済み: Osama Tabbakh 2019 年 7 月 15 日
How to calculate accuracy for neural network algorithms?
  1 件のコメント
Adam
Adam 2019 年 3 月 14 日
I'm pretty sure this is a topic with literally thousands of hits if you google it! Or are you asking specifically about a Matlab coded network, in which case showing some code helps.

サインインしてコメントする。

採用された回答

Greg Heath
Greg Heath 2019 年 3 月 15 日
I normalize the mean-square-error
MSE = mse(error) = mse(output-target)
by the minimum MSE obtained when the output is a constant.
If the output is a constant, the MSE is minimized when that constant is
the average of the target. For a 1-D target
NMSE = mse(output-target) / mse(target-mean(target))
= mse(error) / var(target,1)
This is related to the R-square statistic (AKA as R2) via
Rsquare = R2 = 1 - NMSE
Both NMSE and R2 are contained in [0,1].
I have posted zillions of examples in both the NEWSGROUP and ANSWERS.
Just search using
Greg NMSE
Thank you for formally accepting my answer
Greg
  5 件のコメント
sandhya sandhya
sandhya sandhya 2019 年 3 月 25 日
Input signal with dimension 1*420 was my previous signal ,I forgot to modify the dimension.Now,the input signal with dimension 23*2560 and *.val is the inbuilt file of input signal.If you give command as plot(input),it displays the error.But ,if you give command as
plot(input.val), then it displays the output.Can you please add accuracy commands to my code.
input=load('project1.mat'); 23*2560
target=load('braineeg.mat');
hiddenLayerSize = 10;
net = feedforwardnet(hiddenLayerSize );
net.divideFcn = 'divideind';
net.divideParam.trainInd = 1:1792;
net.divideParam.valInd = 1793:2176;
net.divideParam.testInd = 2177:2560;
net = configure(net,input.val,target.val);
[net,tr] = train(net,input.val,target.val);
view(net)
output = net(input.val);
errors = gsubtract(target.val,output);
performance = perform(net,target.val,output);
view(net)
figure, plotperform(tr)
figure, plottrainstate(tr)
figure, plotconfusion(target.val,output)
[c,cm] = confusion(target.val,output);
figure, ploterrhist(errors)
trainTargets = target.val .* tr.trainMask{1};
valTargets = target.val .* tr.valMask{1};
testTargets = target.val .* tr.testMask{1};
trainPerformance = perform(net,trainTargets,output);
valPerformance = perform(net,valTargets,output);
testPerformance = perform(net,testTargets,output);
YPred = predict(net,input.val);
MSE=mse(output-target.val);
NMSE = MSE / mse(target-mean(target.val));
Osama Tabbakh
Osama Tabbakh 2019 年 7 月 15 日
But what I do not understand is in the way of R-square statistic you calculate with the consideration that the behavior between the target and the output is linear. But when the behavior is nonlinear, then you get high accuracy, although the network produces a large error.

サインインしてコメントする。

その他の回答 (0 件)

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeSequence and Numeric Feature Data Workflows についてさらに検索

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by