Percent Error
16 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
Below is some coding I have calculating percent error of Euler's method however there has to be a more efficient way to input the matrices, I have found the first two step size errors by manually inputing the values but before I do the third (extremely long), there has to be a faster way. Any suggestions?
%%Analytical
simplify(dsolve('Dy=-x/y','y(0)=5','x'))
%%Numerical
f=@(x) (-x^2+25)^(1/2)
dydx=@(x,y) -(x/y);
[x1,y1]=eulode(dydx, [0 5],5,.5);
[x2,y2]=eulode(dydx,[0 5],5,.1);
[x3,y3]=eulode(dydx,[0 5],5,.01);
disp([x1,y1])
disp([x2,y2])
disp([x3,y3])
%%Percent Error
x1=0:.5:5;
x2=0:.1:5;
x3=0:.01:5;
analytical_step1= (-x1.^2+25).^(1/2)
analytical_step2=(-x2.^2+25).^(1/2);
analytical_step3=(-x3.^2+25).^(1/2);
numerical_1=[5.000 5.000 4.9500 4.8490 4.6943 4.4813 4.2024 3.8454 3.3903 2.8004 1.9970 ]
numerical_2=[5.0000 5.0000 4.9980 4.9940 4.9880 4.9800 4.9699 4.9579 4.9437 4.9276 4.9093 4.8889 4.8664 4.8418 4.8149 4.7858 4.7545 4.7208 4.6848 4.6464 4.6055 4.5621 4.5161 4.4673 4.4159 4.3615 4.3042 4.2438 4.1802 4.1132 4.0427 3.9685 3.8904 3.8081 3.7214 3.6301 3.5337 3.4318 3.3240 3.2096 3.0881 2.9586 2.8200 2.6711 2.5101 2.3348 2.1421 1.9273 1.6835 1.3984 1.0480];
Percent_Error1=abs((analytical_step1-numerical_1)/analytical_step1)*100%answer displayed in percent
Percent_Error2=abs((analytical_step2-numerical_2)/analytical_step2)*100%answer displayed in percent
0 件のコメント
採用された回答
bym
2011 年 3 月 28 日
Just use your definition of f to obtain all values at once (do not re-use variables like y1 etc):
Percent_Error1 = abs((y1-f(x1))./f(x1));
where x1 and y1 are outputs from your function eulode()
7 件のコメント
Walter Roberson
2022 年 9 月 15 日
Disculpas, pero Google tiene problemas para traducir "MRD" y "PTMR"
その他の回答 (0 件)
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で Bartlett についてさらに検索
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!