Rare examples of confusing error messages
古いコメントを表示
Usually Matlab creates very helpful error messages, e.g.:
??? Subscript indices must either be real positive integers or logicals.
It does not require much experience to identify the source of this error rapidly. (Finding a solution is completely different story!) Compared with e.g. the messages of famous operating systems or the GCC compiler, the high quality of these messages is extremely helpful.
Do you know counter-examples? Some misleading or irrelevant messages created by Matlab?
3 件のコメント
Daniel Shub
2012 年 4 月 23 日
I like this question.
James Muchechetere
2019 年 8 月 23 日
Yes. Got this message in r2017a:
Error using CPFSKModulator/parenReference
When the BitInput property is set to true, inputs must have be double or logical.
採用された回答
その他の回答 (8 件)
Jan
2012 年 4 月 24 日
2 件のコメント
Andreas Goser
2012 年 4 月 24 日
Such eastereggs have been removed...
+1
Image Analyst
2012 年 4 月 26 日
Too bad. Why can't people have some fun?
Daniel Shub
2012 年 4 月 23 日
2 投票
Definitely on the irrelevant side, but luckily it was taken care of pretty quickly. I think it might be the first bug I reported to TMW.
Basically someone at TMW left a debugging message in the serial port object callback so that it would always rethrow the last warning.
Oleg Komarov
2012 年 4 月 23 日
The guilty one:
foo('')
Undefined function 'foo' for input arguments of type 'char'.
No inputs:
foo
Undefined function or variable 'foo'.
Use as variable OR function?
clear foo
sum(foo)
Undefined function or variable 'foo'.
The two error messages considered together make you think that the first one is simply not properly behaving BECAUSE of the input.
However, most commonly it's the case of "undefined function" which is already implemented!
I suggest to suppress the first one and throw always the second message.
5 件のコメント
Image Analyst
2012 年 4 月 23 日
I agree. If it's not defined for ANY input whatsoever, then it should say so, rather than make you think it's there but just expects doubles or whatever.
Walter Roberson
2012 年 4 月 24 日
It's because of method lookup by class. If it has an argument then it has to look at the functions defined for the class of the argument and it has to ignore all other methods of all other classes. It would be relatively expensive to go back and do a second search to find if there happens to be a function with that name in some other class.
Oleg Komarov
2012 年 4 月 24 日
The question is wether the additional info causes more harm than it would if the info about the class was always omitted.
Image Analyst
2012 年 4 月 24 日
Seems to me it should look it up by function name (m-filename). So it should look for foo.m, not all possible functions of any name that take a class char (which would be a lot) and then determine if any of them are named foo.
Jan
2012 年 4 月 24 日
Daniel Shub
2012 年 4 月 23 日
1 投票
Another unhelpful aspect of error handling in MATLAB is if you catch an error in a callback and then rethrow the error, you lose the stack information.
Walter Roberson
2012 年 4 月 26 日
Invoke Error, Dispatch Exception: Exception Error Occurred
isn't the most enlightening of messages...
Adam
2017 年 1 月 17 日
1 投票

was one I got the other day. Not sure what I had done to get it though! I especially like the one word per line formatting!
2 件のコメント
Steven Lord
2017 年 1 月 17 日
I searched a little bit and I'm not sure that's from a MathWorks function. [It is being displayed in a msgbox with the 'error' Icon, I believe, but that's a function anyone can call.]
Adam
2017 年 1 月 18 日
It's definitely something deep down as I got it again yesterday when I tried to open a file that I had moved and was actually not on my path any more. I hit Ctrl C or pause or something and ended up with that message. It isn't something in my own code or 3rd party code that I have though so not sure what its source is!
カテゴリ
ヘルプ センター および File Exchange で Performance and Memory についてさらに検索
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!