I just tried to replace "for" with "parfor", and there was 50 % time dedutction. I may still need to change trapz with sum.
How do I replace trapz with sum?
5 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
Hi My Matlab is R2016b version, and below is a part of code I am struggling with.
I want to change trapz parts into sum to speed up the calculation.
Can you help me?
elseif fit_method == 2
tic;
N=length(xy(:,2));
N=N-1;
dt = 10^-8;
SY = 0;
t_SY = 0;
Y_SY = 0;
SY_SY = 0;
Y_t = 0;
for M = 2:N
SY_comp = trapz(xy(1:M,1),xy(1:M,2));
SY = SY+SY_comp;
t_SY_comp = M*trapz(xy(1:M,1),xy(1:M,2));
t_SY = t_SY + t_SY_comp;
Y_SY_comp = xy(M,2)*trapz(xy(1:M,1),xy(1:M,2));
Y_SY = Y_SY + Y_SY_comp;
SY_SY_comp = (trapz(xy(1:M,1),xy(1:M,2)))^2;
SY_SY = SY_SY + SY_SY_comp;
Y_t_comp = xy(M,2)*M;
Y_t = Y_t + Y_t_comp;
end;
Y = sum(xy(1:N,2));
t = N*(N+1)/2;
t_t = N*(N+1)*(2*N+1)/6;
A = double([N, SY, t; SY, SY_SY, Y_SY; t, t_SY, t_t]);
B = double([Y;Y_SY;Y_t]);
X = inv(A)*B;
tau = dt/log(1-X(2,1)*dt);
fit_success = 0;
toc;
採用された回答
Roger Stafford
2017 年 4 月 13 日
編集済み: Roger Stafford
2017 年 4 月 13 日
In place of “SY_comp=trapz(xy(1:M,1),xy(1:M,2))” you could write:
SY_comp=1/2*sum(diff(xy(:,1)).*(xy(1:M-1,2)+xy*(2:M,2)));
However, I seriously doubt that this will speed up the calculation. There is no particular reason to assume that Mathworks’ ‘sum’ function is any more efficient than the ‘trapz’ function.
2 件のコメント
Roger Stafford
2017 年 4 月 13 日
If dt is a single scalar value - that is, if all the intervals dt are of the same value - you can use the form
dt*trapz(Y)
instead of
trapz(X,Y)
and that should save time. The equivalent formula using ‘sum’ would be:
dt*((Y(1)+Y(end))/2+sum(Y(2:end-1)));
It is still questionable whether this is faster than trapz(Y).
その他の回答 (0 件)
参考
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!