i have a set of 5 equation that takes the form:
du_i/dt=A_i(u)*(du_i/dx)+B_i(u)
where u(x,t)=[u_1(x,t);u_2(x,t);u_3(x,t);u_4(x,t);u_5(x,t)]
(i=1,2,3,4,5)
**in one of the equations (let us denote this equation with i=1) i have: A_1=0
the pdepe function of matlab seems (maybe im wrong here) to only fit 2nd order pde and above, ignoring the obvious need to be able to solve simpler 1st order pdes, which is absurd.
it says: "f(x,t,u,∂u/∂x) is a flux term and s(x,t,u,∂u/∂x) is a source term. The flux term must depend on ∂u/∂x."
for a 1st order PDE: f(x,t,u,∂u/∂x)=f(x,t,u) and we can always choose f(x,t,u,∂u/∂x)=0. so obviously something is wrong here if i want to solve a 1st order pde using pdepe (unless its legit to put f=0? it seems unlikely, i would like someone to verify this).
even the PDE toolbox (which i never used so i don't know much about it) seems to be designed only for 2D,3D more complex pdes.
it seems absurd to me that despite pdepe and matlab toolbox being able to solve higher order / higher dimensions pdes, there is no simple built-in way to solver the much more simpler 1st order 1D pde, so i had to ask here.
