- For Complex Integrations: S-Function blocks are preferable if you need comprehensive control over hardware interactions and plan to generate production code with Embedded Coder.
- For Simpler Tasks: C Function blocks are suitable for simpler integrations or when you are prototyping.
Example of a Device Driver integrated in Simulink using a Custom block
6 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
Hi,
Can someone point to any example/sample code demonstrating integration of a board specific device driver code ( for example read data from a serial bus like CAN/SPI, or even simpler read data from ADC etc.. ) into SIMULINK with a custom block.
Which is a better choice for such a requirement , S-Function block or a C Function block?
I want to possibly simulate and also generate the glue code to integrate with the low level driver with the embedded coder.
Thanks in advance
AAA
0 件のコメント
回答 (1 件)
akshatsood
2024 年 8 月 20 日
編集済み: akshatsood
2024 年 8 月 20 日
I understand that you are looking for guidance on integrating board-specific device driver code into Simulink using a custom block. You mentioned tasks such as reading data from interfaces like CAN, SPI, or ADC, and you are considering whether to use an S-Function block or a C Function block for this purpose.
S-Function Block: provides extensive flexibility for integrating complex device drivers and managing detailed hardware interactions. Also, supports both simulation and automatic code generation.
C Function Block: simplifies the integration process for less complex tasks, enabling direct incorporation of C code into models. Ideal for rapid prototyping and simple hardware interactions.
Recommendation
I hope this helps.
2 件のコメント
akshatsood
2024 年 8 月 20 日
Dear @Archit
Please refer this: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/39354-device-drivers
参考
製品
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!