フィルターのクリア

Efficient Vectorization of For Loop

3 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
Shreyas Bharadwaj
Shreyas Bharadwaj 2024 年 4 月 15 日
コメント済み: Shreyas Bharadwaj 2024 年 4 月 16 日
Hi,
I have three matrices and C and am trying to compute a fourth matrix Min the following way:
for p = 1:N
for q = 1:N
M(p,q) = 2 * sum(A(:,q) .* conj(B(:,p)) .* C(:,q));
end
end
All matrices are . I am trying to compute this for N = 750 or so and the computation is extremely slow. I cannot find any obvious way to vectorize the code. Any help would be very much appreciated.
Thanks.

採用された回答

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong 2024 年 4 月 15 日
編集済み: Bruno Luong 2024 年 4 月 15 日
Not tested but the sign reading tell me
M = 2*B' * (A.*C);
  4 件のコメント
James Tursa
James Tursa 2024 年 4 月 15 日
編集済み: James Tursa 2024 年 4 月 15 日
I would guess that having 2*B' at the front will force MATLAB to physically compute the conjugate transpose of B first. However, if you segregate the 2* operation as 2 * (B' * (A.*C)), the B' would not need to be physically formed to do the conjugate transpose matrix multiply since this will be handled by flags passed into the BLAS routine. Maybe a bit faster? E.g.,
A = rand(5000); B = rand(5000); C = rand(5000);
timeit(@()2*B' * (A.*C))
ans = 0.5515
timeit(@()2*(B' * (A.*C)))
ans = 0.4901
Shreyas Bharadwaj
Shreyas Bharadwaj 2024 年 4 月 16 日
Thank you!

サインインしてコメントする。

その他の回答 (0 件)

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeLoops and Conditional Statements についてさらに検索

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by