- Objective Function: This remains the same. It would be a function that returns:
- Nonlinear Constraints: You'd create another function, say 'myConstraints', that when given the same inputs as your objective function, returns: This is the upper bound. This is the lower bound.
Tricky restriction in an optimization problem
4 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
Julio Maximiliano Ramirez Oyanarte
2023 年 8 月 17 日
コメント済み: Julio Maximiliano Ramirez Oyanarte
2023 年 8 月 18 日
I will keep the question as general as possible.
I am solving a system of differential-algebraic equations with ode15s and I have an optimization problem, for which I employ the fmincon function. Consider that some parameters of the DAE's will maximize an objective function. This one happens to be the integral of one of the integrated variables across time, say y(17). Thus, we can use the trapz function to calculate the objective function
obj_function = trapz(t, y(:, 17)) % Output of the function given to fmincon
Now comes the tricky part. fmincon can place some restrictions but I want the following one. I would like that, after solving the DAE's, an integral of, consider for example the 4th output variable of the solver y(4) across time is bounded. So we would write
restriction = trapz(t, y(:, 4)); % Restriction that can be calculated only after ode15s is done
And I would like that restriction was bounded, e.g., that it was between 1 and 2.
Is it possible to add this type of restriction so that the parameters to be optimized within fmincon, move as to (1) minimize the objective function, but also (2) keep restriction between said bounds?
Thanks in advance.
0 件のコメント
採用された回答
Mrutyunjaya Hiremath
2023 年 8 月 17 日
'fmincon' is equipped to handle such constraints by accepting a function that provides both equality and inequality constraints. In your case, you want an inequality constraint that keeps the restriction (integral of y(4)) within certain bounds.
Let's break it down:
Where c should be less than or equal to 0 for the optimization constraints to be satisfied.
Let's draft the constraints function:
function [c, ceq] = myConstraints(parameters)
% Solve the DAE using the given parameters
% Assuming the DAE's are solved using a function named solveDAE
[t, y] = solveDAE(parameters);
% Inequality constraints
c(1) = trapz(t, y(:, 4)) - 2;
c(2) = 1 - trapz(t, y(:, 4));
% No equality constraints
ceq = [];
end
Call to fmincon:
x0 = initial_parameters; % starting point
A = []; b = []; % No linear inequality constraints
Aeq = []; beq = []; % No linear equality constraints
lb = lower_bounds; % Lower bounds on parameters
ub = upper_bounds; % Upper bounds on parameters
nonlcon = @myConstraints; % Nonlinear constraints function
[x_optimal, fval] = fmincon(@objectiveFunction, x0, A, b, Aeq, beq, lb, ub, nonlcon);
Where 'objectiveFunction' is another function similar to 'myConstraints' but only returns the value of 'obj_function'.
With this, fmincon will optimize your parameters such that the integral of y(17) is minimized while ensuring that the integral of y(4) remains between 1 and 2.
5 件のコメント
Bruno Luong
2023 年 8 月 17 日
AI surprises me from day to day, but no @Mrutyunjaya Hiremath answer is too good to be AI generated IMO.
I posted much shorter answer but I deleted since @Mrutyunjaya Hiremath answer is much elaborated and helpful.
その他の回答 (0 件)
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で Surrogate Optimization についてさらに検索
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!