Problem in solving a Fokker-Planck equation
32 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
I have written a matlab code to solve a Fokker-Planck equation using finite difference method. The PDE is of the form
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36f6c/36f6c1aa83ef6a77f61f50a690f5e9552957b8e7" alt=""
Where F1(x1,x2) = ((a*x1^n)/(S^n+x1^n) + (b*S^n)/(S^n+x2^n) - k1*x1)
F2(x1,x2) = ((a*x2^n)/(S^n+x2^n)+ (b*S^n)/(S^n+x1^n) - k1*x2)
and the finite difference scheme is given as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51cc6/51cc6951405d163ac7382f52aaf36b3f57159895" alt=""
When the parameter a=1, there should be three peak for P(: , :, Nt) near three different spatial point and for a=0.2 there will be two peak (in surface plot)
But for my matlab code I am getting only one peak for any value of a.
I can't understand what going wrong....
clc;
clear all
Nx=100;Ny=100;Nt=1000;
xmin=0;xmax=3;
ymin=0;ymax=3;
dx=(xmax-xmin)/(Nx-1);dy=-(ymin-ymax)/(Ny-1);
tmin=0;tmax=1;
dt=-(tmin-tmax)/(Nt-1);
D=0.04;
%define grids
x=(0:Nx-1)*dx;
y=(0:Ny-1)*dy;
k=(0:Nt-1)*dt;
[X,Y]=meshgrid(x,y);
%parameter values
a=0.2;b=1;S=0.5;k1=1;k2=1;n=4;
% F1=@(u,v)((a*u^n)/(S^n+u^n)+(b*S^n)/(S^n+v^n)-k1*u);
% F2=@(u,v)((a*v^n)/(S^n+v^n)+(b*S^n)/(S^n+u^n)-k1*v);
F1 =((a*X.^n)./(S^n+X.^n)+(b*S^n)./(S^n+Y.^n)-k1*X);
F2 =((a*Y.^n)./(S^n+Y.^n)+(b*S^n)./(S^n+X.^n)-k1*Y);
P = zeros(Nx,Ny,Nt);
%Initial conditions
P(:,:,1)=exp(-((X-0.1).^2 / (2)) - ((Y).^2 / (2)));
%% Boundary conditions
P(1,:,:)=0;P(Nx,:,:)=0;
P(:,1,:)=0;P(:,Ny,:)=0;
for i=2:Nx-1
for j=2:Ny-1
for k=1:Nt-1
P(i,j,k+1)=P(i,j,k)+dt*(-P(i,j,k)*((F1(i+1,j)-F1(i-1,j))/(2*dx))-P(i,j,k)*((F2(i,j+1)-F2(i,j-1))/(2*dy))-(F1(i,j))*...
((P(i+1,j,k)-P(i-1,j,k))/(2*dx))-F2(i,j)*((P(i,j+1,k)-P(i,j-1,k))/(2*dx))+D*(((P(i+1,j,k)-2*P(i,j,k)+P(i-1,j,k))/(dx^2))+...
((P(i,j+1,k)-2*P(i,j,k)+P(i,j-1,k))/(dy^2))));
end
end
end
surf(X,Y,P(:,:,Nt-1));
Please help me to solve it correctly.
Sorry for my bad english.
2 件のコメント
Torsten
2023 年 7 月 21 日
編集済み: Torsten
2023 年 7 月 21 日
The boundary conditions and the initial conditions are not allowed to come into conflict for your equation. This seems to be the case for the example in Zhou et al. because it's written there: "Here, the Neumann or Dirichlet boundary conditions hav no influence upon the result." It is not the case for your initial function exp(-((X-0.1).^2 / (2)) - ((Y).^2 / (2))). Plot it, and you will see why.
What profile do you expect after t = 1 ?
採用された回答
Torsten
2023 年 7 月 21 日
編集済み: Torsten
2023 年 7 月 21 日
The order of your loops is wrong. Try
Nx=100;Ny=100;Nt=1000;
xmin=0;xmax=3;
ymin=0;ymax=3;
dx=(xmax-xmin)/(Nx-1);
dy=(ymax-ymin)/(Ny-1);
tmin=0;tmax=1;
dt=(tmax-tmin)/(Nt-1);
D=0.04;
%define grids
x=(0:Nx-1)*dx;
y=(0:Ny-1)*dy;
%parameter values
a=1;b=1;S=0.5;k1=1;k2=1;n=4;
F1 =@(x,y)(a*x.^n)./(S^n+x.^n)+(b*S^n)./(S^n+y.^n)-k1*x;
F2 =@(x,y)(a*y.^n)./(S^n+y.^n)+(b*S^n)./(S^n+x.^n)-k1*y;
P = zeros(Nx,Ny,Nt);
%Initial conditions
for i = 1:Nx
for j = 1:Ny
P(i,j,1)=exp(-((x(i)-0.1)^2 + y(j)^2)/2);
end
end
%% Boundary conditions
P(1,:,:)=0;P(Nx,:,:)=0;
P(:,1,:)=0;P(:,Ny,:)=0;
for k=1:Nt-1
for i=2:Nx-1
for j=2:Ny-1
P(i,j,k+1)=P(i,j,k)+dt*(-P(i,j,k)*((F1(x(i+1),y(j))-F1(x(i-1),y(j)))/(2*dx))...
-P(i,j,k)*((F2(x(i),y(j+1))-F2(x(i),y(j-1)))/(2*dy))...
-F1(x(i),y(j))*(P(i+1,j,k)-P(i-1,j,k))/(2*dx)...
-F2(x(i),y(j))*(P(i,j+1,k)-P(i,j-1,k))/(2*dy)...
+D*((P(i+1,j,k)-2*P(i,j,k)+P(i-1,j,k))/dx^2+...
((P(i,j+1,k)-2*P(i,j,k)+P(i,j-1,k))/dy^2)));
end
end
end
PNt = P(:,:,Nt);
m = max(PNt(:))
surf(x,y,P(:,:,Nt))
2 件のコメント
その他の回答 (0 件)
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で Boundary Conditions についてさらに検索
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!