フィルターのクリア

Plot sin or cosine with Simulink scope

7 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
Javier
Javier 2015 年 3 月 24 日
編集済み: Javier 2015 年 3 月 25 日
Hello all,
I would like to do some simulate some home-made modulation with Simulink, but first things first; so I was trying to plot the output ( a sin wave) from a signal generator into a Simulink scope, however I am coming across a issue when depicting the output into the scope, since I don´t get my sin signal but I got some crappy signal instead as it can be seen below, and looking at its PSD I think I am loosing samples or something with the simulation step.
I have found some aid in this Matlab blog, however, I cannot get the plot that I would like to, my signal input is a sin with f=2.1e6.
Is there something I can do to get my sin signal in the scope?
Thanks in advance,
Regards!
EDIT: I am using matlab2014a

採用された回答

Javier
Javier 2015 年 3 月 25 日
編集済み: Javier 2015 年 3 月 25 日
Finally I solved it with the advices of Sebastian and making use of Mathworks blog.
Thus my solution was:
fo(carrier)= 2e6Hz
Be compliant with Nyquist: fs>=2*fo or Ts<=(To/2) where To=1/(2*fo)=2.5e-7s => Ts = 2.5e-7s
Model parameters
>> solver >> Max step size = Ts = 2.5e-7
>> solver >> Stop time = 0.05
>> Data Import/Export >> Output options : Refine Output >> Refine Factor = 100
Thus I got this signal

その他の回答 (1 件)

Sebastian Castro
Sebastian Castro 2015 年 3 月 24 日
Javier,
By default, if no other blocks drive it, Simulink will choose a sample time of 1/50 the total time -- so, in your case, 2000/50 = 40 seconds. This is definitely too large for a 2.1 MHz sine wave.
To fix this,
  1. Go to Simulation > Model Configuration Parameters and select the "Solver" pane on the left.
  2. Once you're there, you can change the "Max time step" parameter to something acceptable -- i.e., anything below 1/(2*fs), and probably an integer divisor of (1/fs).
  3. If you don't think you need the default variable-step solver in Simulink, you can change to a fixed-step solver with a sample time similar to what I described above.
Does this solve your problem?
- Sebastian
  3 件のコメント
Sebastian Castro
Sebastian Castro 2015 年 3 月 25 日
編集済み: Sebastian Castro 2015 年 3 月 25 日
You interpreted my point correctly. I used "fs" to mean the sampling frequency -- so yes, you choose a sample time such that aliasing is prevented.
Also, I think it's expected for the simulation to take forever. If you're running a 2000-second simulation with a sample time of 2.5e-7, there are a lot of data points to process.
One thing you can do is change from sample-based (one sample at a time) processing to frame-based processing (using buffers). Look at the following link:
- Sebastian
Javier
Javier 2015 年 3 月 25 日
Thanks for the advices Sebastian, thanks to then I have managed it but without using the buffers, just reducing the simulation time to 0.05s, a Ts=2..5e-6s(Max time step) and making use of the link I mention in my original post;that's to say, I have use the redefin option under "Data export" and I have set it at 100, then I got a good view of my signal.

サインインしてコメントする。

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeScopes and Data Logging についてさらに検索

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by