Why Im_ref = 2⋅T ref /3⋅p⋅λ pm for Interior PMSM? in MTPA Control Reference
3 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
according to equation: Te= 3/2*p*(λpm*iq+(Ld− Lq)*id*iq)
Im_ref should not equal to 2⋅T ref /3⋅p⋅λ pm for interior PMSM, right? Thanks!
4 件のコメント
Rik
2022 年 11 月 1 日
This is too deep for me. If it is incorrect, you should contact support to have that verified and corrected.
If it is correct but you simply do not understand, I suspect your question is better suited elsewhere.
回答 (1 件)
Joel Van Sickel
2022 年 11 月 1 日
The first equation your have underlined is the maximum current reference limit used for a specific type of control ( MTPA) while the other equation is the mathematical model of of a motor (albeit a simplified equation as this is for a lumped parameter motor model). These equations are not the same nor should they be, although the controller algorithm is derived from the mathematical model equation (elimnate the (Ld-Lq)*id*iq by setting id to zero and they are identical. Further work is required in the controller after calculating maximum current to calculate reference id and iq current values.
2 件のコメント
Joel Van Sickel
2022 年 11 月 10 日
you are correct, it would be slightly different, which is why the equation for the model is more specific to account for this case.
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で Control Algorithm Design についてさらに検索
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!