In trackerGNN, why is the costOfNonAssignment half of the Assignment Threshold?
1 回表示 (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
Ozlem Gumuskanat
2022 年 3 月 17 日
コメント済み: Elad Kivelevitch
2022 年 4 月 29 日
In trackerGNN, why is the costOfNonAssignment half of the Assignment Threshold?
0 件のコメント
採用された回答
Elad Kivelevitch
2022 年 3 月 17 日
Because the penalty for not assigning a detection to a track is applied twice - once for the unassigned detection and once for the unassigned track.
2 件のコメント
Elad Kivelevitch
2022 年 4 月 29 日
It has nothing to do with the choice of assignment algorithm or matrix multiplication. It is just part of the assignment cost. Let's say you have only one track and one detection with a cost of assignment being 20 and cost of non-assignment being 15.
So, the optimal solution is actually gained from assigning the detection to the track, because you incur a cost of 20. If you didn't assign them, the unassigned track would cost you 15 and the unassigned detection would cost you another 15, leading to a total cost of 30.
Because it could be confusing why a cost of 20 is better than a cost of nonassignment of 15 we decided to ask for the 30 and split it in half internally.
その他の回答 (0 件)
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で Tracking and Sensor Fusion についてさらに検索
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!