FPGA: Advantages coding conversion using HDL coder vs. direct coding in VHDL/Verilog
1 回表示 (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
Dear all,
I would like to know, since the conversion of Simulink to VHDL/Verilog coding could be done using HDL coder tool etc, what are the advantages of having Quartus/Nios2 for instance to program a FPGA? Forgive me if this really sounds stupid.
0 件のコメント
採用された回答
Tim McBrayer
2014 年 11 月 17 日
HDL Coder will generate bit true and cycle accurate HDL code from your Simulink or MATLAB design. It is not a synthesis tool; it cannot create a FPGA bitstream like Altera Quartus II does. The HDL Coder Workflow Advisor does integrate with Quartus (and Xilinx ISE and Vivado) to make it easy to generate the bistream using a 3rd-party synthesis tool. The HDL Verifier product allows the direct downloading of the bistream onto a supported board, and simulating on the actual hardware from within a Simulink simulation.
0 件のコメント
その他の回答 (0 件)
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で FPGA, ASIC, and SoC Development についてさらに検索
製品
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!