フィルターのクリア

Vectorize product into new dimension

1 回表示 (過去 30 日間)
Frank Rosler
Frank Rosler 2021 年 12 月 13 日
コメント済み: Frank Rosler 2021 年 12 月 14 日
I often run into for-loops like the following (minimal working example):
A = randn(1000);
b = randn(1,1000);
lA = size(A,1);
lb = length(b);
B = zeros(lA,lA,lb);
for k=1:lb
B(:,:,k) = A*b(k);
end
Is there a good way to vectorize this to make it faster? I tried writing
B = reshape(kron(b,A),lA,lA,lb)
but this is not always faster and sometimes even substantially slower than the for-loop.

回答 (1 件)

Steven Lord
Steven Lord 2021 年 12 月 13 日
Using slightly smaller arrays so these lines can run in Answers:
A = randn(100);
b = randn(1,100);
lA = size(A,1);
lb = length(b);
tic
B = zeros(lA,lA,lb);
for k=1:lb
B(:,:,k) = A*b(k);
end
toc
Elapsed time is 0.007129 seconds.
tic
B2 = A.*reshape(b, 1, 1, []);
toc
Elapsed time is 0.003494 seconds.
max(abs(B-B2), [], 'all')
ans = 0
  1 件のコメント
Frank Rosler
Frank Rosler 2021 年 12 月 14 日
Thanks for that, I hadn't seen this before.
Oddly enough, the computation time seems to depend heavily on the sizes of A and b. If they're both of size 100, then indeed your method is faster than the for loop. But when I tried the same code with both A and b of size 1000, the computation times (for 4 runs on my laptop) were as follows:
'for loop:' 2.4059
'vectorized:' 5.0114
----------------------
'for loop:' 2.3183
'vectorized:' 4.8548
----------------------
'for loop:' 2.2921
'vectorized:' 4.9109
----------------------
'for loop:' 2.3115
'vectorized:' 4.6621
----------------------

サインインしてコメントする。

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeLoops and Conditional Statements についてさらに検索

製品


リリース

R2020b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by