low speed of 'ismember' function
2 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
hi. in my code there is a for loop like the following:
for i=1:n
N=find(~ismember(Vector1,Vector2))
do something...
end
This loop is repeated several thousand times. 'ismember' function is very slow. So that most of the runtime for 'ismember' function lost. Is there any alternative to this?
![](https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/uploaded_files/145223/image.jpeg)
0 件のコメント
回答 (3 件)
Johan Löfberg
2014 年 8 月 29 日
If data is sorted, using ismembc could be a quick fix.
2 件のコメント
Johan Löfberg
2014 年 8 月 29 日
Then I would scratch ismember and do sort+ismembc (ismember contains a lot of overhead. look into it and you will see that it basically does sort+ismembc once all data is checked etc)
David Sanchez
2014 年 8 月 29 日
Depending on your data, you might try to code your own function avoiding some conditions and calls to sub-functions within the ismember function.
You can take a look at ismember code with:
type ismember
and try to make it easier.
3 件のコメント
José-Luis
2014 年 8 月 29 日
The way you use ismember() seems to be inefficient. You are going to be processing similar things over and over. You could instead loop through the variable of interest, do an exhaustive search, save that somewhere and then %do something based on those results.
Titus Edelhofer
2014 年 8 月 29 日
Hi,
does "Vector1" and "Vector2" changes in every iteration? Often you see something like
for i=1:n
v = ismember(x(i), y);
% do something
end
which can be changed to
vAll = ismember(x, y);
for i=1:n
% now do something with vAll(i)
end
Titus
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で Loops and Conditional Statements についてさらに検索
製品
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!