reduce
Simplified access to Hankel singular value based model reduction functions
Syntax
GRED = reduce(G) GRED = reduce(G,order) [GRED,redinfo] = reduce(G,'key1','value1',...) [GRED,redinfo] = reduce(G,order,'key1','value1',...)
Description
reduce
returns a reduced order model GRED
of G
and
a struct array redinfo
containing the error bound
of the reduced model, Hankel singular values of the original system
and some other relevant model reduction information.
An error bound is a measure of how close GRED
is
to G
and is computed based on either additive
error, ∥ G-GRED
∥∞, multiplicative
error, ∥G
–1(G-GRED)
∥∞,
or nugap error (ref.: ncfmr
) [1],[4],[5].
Hankel singular values of a stable system indicate the respective
state energy of the system. Hence, reduced order can be directly determined
by examining the system Hankel SV's. Model reduction routines, which
based on Hankel singular values are grouped by their error bound types.
In many cases, the additive error method GRED=reduce(G,ORDER)
is
adequate to provide a good reduced order model. But for systems with
lightly damped poles and/or zeros, a multiplicative error method (namely, GRED=reduce(G,ORDER,'ErrorType','mult')
)
that minimizes the relative error between G
and GRED
tends
to produce a better fit.
This table describes input arguments for reduce
.
Argument | Description |
---|---|
G | LTI model to be reduced (without any other inputs will plot its Hankel singular values and prompt for reduced order). |
ORDER | (Optional) Integer for the desired order of the reduced model, or optionally a vector packed with desired orders for batch runs. |
A batch run of a serial of different reduced order models can
be generated by specifying order = x:y
, or a vector
of integers. By default, all the anti-stable part of a physical system
is kept, because from control stability point of view, getting rid
of unstable state(s) is dangerous to model a system.
'
MaxError
'
can
be specified in the same fashion as an alternative for '
ORDER
'
after
an '
ErrorType
'
is
selected. In this case, reduced order will be determined when the
sum of the tails of the Hankel SV's reaches the '
MaxError
'
.
Argument | Value | Description |
---|---|---|
|
| Default for Option for Option for Default for Default for |
|
| Additive error (default) Multiplicative error at model output NCF nugap error |
| A real number or a vector of different errors | Reduce to achieve H∞ error. When
present, |
|
| Optimal 1x2 cell array of LTI weights |
|
| Display Hankel singular plots (default |
| Integer, vector or cell array | Order of reduced model. Use only if not specified as 2nd argument. |
Weights on the original model input and/or output can make the model reduction algorithm focus on some frequency range of interests. But weights have to be stable, minimum phase and invertible.
This table describes output arguments.
Argument | Description |
---|---|
GRED | LTI reduced order model. Becomes multi-dimensional array when input is a serial of different model order array. |
REDINFO | A STRUCT array with 3 fields:
|
G
can be stable or unstable. G
and GRED
can
be either continuous or discrete.
A successful model reduction with a well-conditioned original
model G
will ensure that the reduced model GRED
satisfies
the infinity norm error bound.
Examples
References
[1] K. Glover, “All Optimal Hankel Norm Approximation of Linear Multivariable Systems, and Their L∝- error Bounds,” Int. J. Control, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1145-1193, 1984.
[2] M. G. Safonov and R. Y. Chiang, “A Schur Method for Balanced Model Reduction,” IEEE Trans. on Automat. Contr., vol. AC-2, no. 7, July 1989, pp. 729-733.
[3] M. G. Safonov, R. Y. Chiang and D. J. N. Limebeer, “Optimal Hankel Model Reduction for Nonminimal Systems,” IEEE Trans. on Automat. Contr., vol. 35, No. 4, April, 1990, pp. 496-502.
[4] M. G. Safonov and R. Y. Chiang, “Model Reduction for Robust Control: A Schur Relative-Error Method,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 2, pp. 259-272, 1988.
[5] K. Zhou, “Frequency weighted L[[BULLET]] error bounds,” Syst. Contr. Lett., Vol. 21, 115-125, 1993.
Version History
Introduced before R2006a