K-mean for Wine data set
3 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
Hi,
I performed a K-mean algorithm command on the wine data set from UCI respiratory. This dataset contains chemical analysis of 178 wines, derived from three different cultivars. Wine type is based on 13 continuous features.
Here's the command load 'wine_data.txt';
[IDX,C,sumd,D] = kmeans(wine_data,3,... 'start','sample',... 'Replicates',100,... 'maxiter',1000, 'display','final');
The final Best total sum of distances is 2.37069e+06. This result is way far from the reported K-means solution from the literature, which is aournd 18,061. Is the K-mean solution of Matlab stuck in local minima? Please advice. Thanks.
1 件のコメント
the cyclist
2013 年 8 月 27 日
For anyone who is interested in helping out on this one, the data set is here: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Wine
回答 (4 件)
Shashank Prasanna
2013 年 8 月 27 日
Ganesh, what distance metric does the 'literature' use?
The kmeans default is 'sqEuclidean'. You have to make sure you are comparing the same metric. Try changing it to cityblock or any of the other options:
0 件のコメント
gheorghe gardu
2015 年 11 月 1 日
I would like to ask if you could post the Matlab code that you have used ? I would like to thank you in advance.
0 件のコメント
Paul Munro
2023 年 2 月 21 日
The large distance sum you report makes me think that you did not rescale the data. Variable 13 is in the thousands and will overwhelm the effect of the other variables. You will probably get better results if you rescale the variables separately (Z scoring for example).
0 件のコメント
参考
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!