When will Jacket be merged into Parallel Computing Toolbox?

I read that MathWorks has acquired the competing Jacket product from Accelereyes:
We were considering using Jacket for the GPU interface instead of Parallel Computing Toolbox since multiple articles indicate that Jacket is faster and supports more MATLAB functions than PCT. But now that Jacket is part of the MathWorks family I would expect its functionality to get merged into PCT.
Does anyone know if this is the case? I don't see anything on the MathWorks site mentioning the acquisition or any timeline for updating PCT with Jacket features.
BTW I am currently using R2012b. Do I perhaps need to move up to R2013a?
Thanks for any info.

8 件のコメント

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2013 年 7 月 25 日
The article does not indicate that MathWorks has acquired Jacket; it indicates that the two companies are "working together" (in some unspecified way.)
Terry McKiernan
Terry McKiernan 2013 年 7 月 25 日
Walter, thanks for your reply. Maybe we are interpreting what it says in the article differently.
In the 2nd paragraph of the article it states:
"AccelerEyes has sold Jacket as a 3rd-party add-on to the MathWorks MATLAB® product."
I read this to say "Accelereyes sold Jacket to MathWorks", since immediately after that it says they are no longer selling new Jacket licenses. But I guess it could instead be interpreted as simply a statement of historical fact, i.e. "in the past, Jacket was sold (to end users) as an add-on to MATLAB".
Either way, have you heard anything about future plans for MATLAB involving Jacket features?
Thanks
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2013 年 7 月 25 日
I have not heard anything.
I think the statement has to be interpreted historically, as you cannot sell a product to a product, only to a company.
Ben Tordoff
Ben Tordoff 2013 年 7 月 26 日
Hi Terry,
to me the most important question is whether PCT already supports the functions that you need. If you could describe which functions you need on the GPU or what MATLAB functionality you typically use in your work, we can work out whether PCT will do the job for you.
Cheers
Ben
Stefan
Stefan 2013 年 8 月 6 日
Hi Ben,
I pointed out what I need from MATLABs GPU computing solution here:
Basically, MATLABs built in GPU functions are implemented very poorly and are slow - I am ending up reimplementing most of them myself. Also sparse matrices are not supported.
Jacket was a much better product. However, it looks like Mathworks has sued Accelereyes (using some ridicuoulous accusations) and forced them to discontinue there product.
Otherwise I really like MATLAB - but this was a bad move and costs me a lot of time.
Regards, Stefan
Michal Kvasnicka
Michal Kvasnicka 2013 年 11 月 15 日
A little bit more info: here and here
Christopher
Christopher 2014 年 3 月 23 日
Are there any updates on this situation?
Nick Chng
Nick Chng 2015 年 10 月 13 日
Still waiting for an update. I miss Jacket's gfor and interp3 implementations, which remain faster, and with more functionality, in R2012b than they are in R2015b.

サインインしてコメントする。

回答 (2 件)

Gareth Thomas
Gareth Thomas 2014 年 3 月 23 日

0 投票

One way would be to look at the Parallel computing toolbox release notes since R2012b.
As R2013a, R2013b, R2014a are now out.
The number of functions supported grows every release.
Rob Campbell
Rob Campbell 2015 年 8 月 25 日

0 投票

It seems they're now at http://arrayfire.com/ and are open source.

カテゴリ

ヘルプ センター および File ExchangeParallel Computing Toolbox についてさらに検索

タグ

質問済み:

2013 年 7 月 25 日

コメント済み:

2015 年 10 月 13 日

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by