Why the feature should be RST invarient..when extracting a feature from an image..

3 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
mano49j
mano49j 2013 年 4 月 3 日
A good feature should have high varinace and it should be RST invariant for image. Why is it so?
  1 件のコメント
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2013 年 4 月 4 日
This appears to be a theory question rather than a MATLAB question.

サインインしてコメントする。

回答 (2 件)

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2013 年 4 月 4 日
If "RST" here stands for "Rotation, Scaling, Translation", then under what circumstances would it be beneficial to have a feature that was varient under one of those operations?
  2 件のコメント
Image Analyst
Image Analyst 2013 年 4 月 4 日
One example, robots to "pick and place" parts from a bin onto an assembly they're building.
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2013 年 4 月 4 日
True, size (scale) could be important in some contexts that involved calibrated sensors.

サインインしてコメントする。


Image Analyst
Image Analyst 2013 年 4 月 4 日
That's only true for certain situations. I'm sure you can imaging situations were you'd like them to vary and situations where you'd like them not to vary. Though I can't think of any situations where you'd want the feature measurements to have a high variance instead of a low variance. Invariant and variance are different concepts, but not antonymns (opposites) - consult a dictionary.

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeImage Processing Toolbox についてさらに検索

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by