Alternative to blkdiag and mat2cell functions

5 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
KostasK 2020 年 12 月 13 日
編集済み: Bruno Luong 2020 年 12 月 13 日
Hi all,
I currently have a code which takes some matrix A and stacks each row of the aforementioned matrix in to a block diagonal matrx C such that:
The code for that is:
Nc = 10 ; % Number of rows of A
Nb = 4 ; % Number of columns of A
A = randn(Nc, Nb) ;
B = mat2cell(A, ones(Nc, 1), Nb) ;
C = blkdiag(B{:}) ;
Generating matrix C however is extremely slow as I run a similar piece of code as shown above a couple of thousands of times. From timing the entire thing, MATLAB has pointed out that the mat2cell and blkdiag functions are by far the slowest ones, so I thought I should replace them in the following way:
Nb = 4 ;
Nc = 10 ;
A = randn(Nc, Nb) ;
C = zeros(Nc, Nb*Nc) ; % preallocate C
ridx = repmat(1:Nc, 1, Nb)' ; % row indices of where each element of A should be in C
cidx = reshape(reshape(1:Nb*Nc, Nb, Nc)', [], 1) ; % column indices of where each element of A should be in C
C(ridx, cidx) = A ;
In short, the above code simply spots the indices of where all the elements of matrix A should be allocated on matrix C, thus cidx is the row indices and ridx is the column indices.
Even though these indices are correct, this code returns an error as the matrix C(ridx, cidx) is a [Nb*Nc x Nb*Nc] matrix (or 40x40 in this case), and A is a [Nc x Nb] matrix. I did not expect that since ridx and cidx are column vectors representing indices, so I would simply expect that all the elements of A would transfer to C at the specified indices.
So how can I make the above code run correctly?
Thanks for your help in advance.
  2 件のコメント
KostasK 2020 年 12 月 13 日
Apologies, made a mess out of copy pasting where I changed the name of the variables from my code to the code that I posted here. I edited this accordingly.



Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2020 年 12 月 13 日
You could consider using sparse() to put the matrix together. It is designed to take vectors of row coordinates and corresponding column coordinates and corresponding values, and assemble them into a matrix. You could then full() if you need to.
The difficulty you are encountering is that when you index on multiple non-scalar indices, then MATLAB does not use "corresponding" elements. Instead, MATLAB uses all possible combinations of indices.
M([1 2], [3 4]) = 5
would assign to M(1,3), M(2,3), M(1,4), M(2,4)
MATLAB does not have a syntax for "corresponding" index assignment. Instead what you need to do is use a method of converting the corresponding indices into linear indices and assign to there. The function designed to work convert corresponding indices into linear indices is sub2ind().
There are occasions on which it pays to skip using sub2ind() and instead use the mathematical transformations involved -- especially if you are doing several cases of assigning to sub-arrays of consistent sizes and spatial relationship. For example, if you have the linear indices IDX for a block at (R,C) and want to address something further down the diagonal, then
new_IDX = IDX + CD*number_of_rows + RD
where CD is difference in columns and RD is difference in rows .
  1 件のコメント
KostasK 2020 年 12 月 13 日
Thanks for that. I see then that linear indexing would be the way to go rather than subscripts


その他の回答 (2 件)

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong 2020 年 12 月 13 日
What about about a simple for-loop
[Nb,Nc] = size(A);
C = zeros(Nb,Nb*Nc);
for r=1:Nb
C(r,(r-1)*Nc+(1:Nc)) = A(r,:);

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong 2020 年 12 月 13 日
編集済み: Bruno Luong 2020 年 12 月 13 日
[I,J] = ndgrid(1:Nb,1:Nc);
C = accumarray([I(:),J(:)+(I(:)-1)*Nc],A(:));

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by