Does variable size definition affect SIMULINK performance? Vector vs Scalar

2 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
Luis Ruiz
Luis Ruiz 2019 年 4 月 22 日
コメント済み: Walter Roberson 2019 年 4 月 22 日
I have a SIMULINK simulation and as I understand if a define the size of a I/O as let's say it, 3, it means it is a vector, but SIMULINK recognizes that it only has one dimension.
Now, if I declare the I/O as [3 1], it is also a vector but this time it has two dimensions. More over signals defined with 3 and signal with [3 1] cannot be used together in some cases.
So, my question is: which way should I use? Does SIMULINK performance is affected by this convention?
  1 件のコメント
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson 2019 年 4 月 22 日
There are portions of Simulink that treat an explicit dimension of 1 as meaning "variable length". So [3 1] might be interpreted as a 2D array that is 3 rows and an indefinite number of columns.

サインインしてコメントする。

回答 (0 件)

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeSimulink についてさらに検索

製品


リリース

R2018a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by