Sparse for element by element operation

33 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
D_coder
D_coder 2018 年 9 月 15 日
コメント済み: D_coder 2018 年 9 月 16 日
If we want to perform the product of two sparse matrices or sparse and a full matrix , sparse function is very useful as it avoids multiplications with zero. However when we do element by element multiplication of two sparse matrices or a sparse matrix and a full matrix it is observed that it takes a considerable amount of time as compared to the multiplication of full matrices. Here is a concrete example
A = sprand(1000,1000,0.005);
B = rand(1000,1000);
Af = full(A);
timeit(@() Af.*B)
ans =
5.1227e-04
timeit(@() A.*B)
ans =
0.0011
How do I tackle this issue when I am looking for a considerable lower time than the multiplication of two full matrices?

回答 (2 件)

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong 2018 年 9 月 15 日
編集済み: Bruno Luong 2018 年 9 月 15 日
A = sprand(1000,1000,0.005);
B = rand(1000,1000);
tic
Af = full(A);
AB=Af.*B;
toc % Elapsed time is 0.011628 seconds.
tic
AB=A.*B;
toc % Elapsed time is 0.004143 seconds.
Recommended solution
tic
[i,j,a]=find(A);
b=B(sub2ind(size(B),i,j));
AB=sparse(i,j,a.*b);
toc % Elapsed time is 0.001570 seconds.
  3 件のコメント
Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong 2018 年 9 月 16 日
編集済み: Bruno Luong 2018 年 9 月 16 日
Why you think my code assumes some loop or not ? It just carries out the element-wise product A.*B like other methods.
D_coder
D_coder 2018 年 9 月 16 日
It's not your code that assumes a loop , my code has a loop that runs for 9000 times and I have already tried doing sparse inside it , it gives me a worse performance than the original thing without sparse

サインインしてコメントする。


Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong 2018 年 9 月 15 日
編集済み: Bruno Luong 2018 年 9 月 15 日
You might also interested in this FEX
[i,j]=find(A);
b=B(sub2ind(size(B),i,j));
AB=setsparse(A,i,j,b,@times);

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeLoops and Conditional Statements についてさらに検索

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by