"Reshaping" matrix
1 回表示 (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
I have a matrix P_ind that is AxB (where each element is an integer in the range 1:C) and a matrix xgrid that is CxDxB. Is there a smart way to create a new matrix xgrid2 that is AxDxB without resorting to the for loop solution below?
xgrid2=NaN(A,D,B);
for i=1:A
for j=1:B
xgrid2(i,:,j)=xgrid(P_ind(i,j),:,j);
end
end
Edit: Since there were comments on the clarity of my question, let me try again. What I want to do is create the array xgrid2 in the code below, but in a more succint and most of all faster way than the nested for loops in my approach.
A=10000; % no. of individuals
B=65; % maximum age
C=30; % gridpoints for P
D=50; % gridpoints for S
P_ind=randi(C,A,B);
xgrid=randi(5000,A,D,B);
xgrid2=NaN(A,D,B);
for i=1:A
for j=1:B
xgrid2(i,:,j)=xgrid(P_ind(i,j),:,j);
end
end
2 件のコメント
Triveni
2015 年 11 月 1 日
reshape(xgrid2',i,j,[])
tell your question clearly.
your script is not running.
採用された回答
Philip Borghesani
2015 年 11 月 17 日
編集済み: Philip Borghesani
2015 年 11 月 17 日
Simpler and faster solution get rid of the outer loop:
xgrid3=NaN(A,D,B);
tic
for j=1:B
xgrid3(:,:,j)=xgrid(P_ind(:,j),:,j);
end
t2=toc
For me the time went from 3.1 second to 0.13 seconds.
Some performance concepts:
- Not all for loops are bad
- Try to not loop over the first indices of an array.
- If you must loop over the first indices then make that loop the inner loop to traverse memory in the natural order.
- Any solution that uses sub2ind is probably not optimal because of the extra work it must do and because it is rather slow.
Using sub2ind is a programming design trade-off because it may make the code easier to understand and debug.
0 件のコメント
その他の回答 (2 件)
Kelly Kearney
2015 年 11 月 17 日
My rule of thumb for this type of problem is to permute and reshape the matrices in such a way that you can access the dimension(s) of interest via linear indexing rather than subscripts.
The data:
A=10000; % no. of individuals
B=65; % maximum age
C=30; % gridpoints for P
D=50; % gridpoints for S
P_ind=randi(C,A,B);
xgrid=randi(5000,A,D,B);
Your way (loops)
tic;
xgrid2=NaN(A,D,B);
for i=1:A
for j=1:B
xgrid2(i,:,j)=xgrid(P_ind(i,j),:,j);
end
end
t(1) = toc;
New way (permute, reshape, index, unreshape, unpermute)
tic;
xgrdtmp = reshape(permute(xgrid, [1 3 2]), [], D);
[ii,jj] = ndgrid(1:A,1:B);
pidx = sub2ind(size(P_ind), ii, jj);
idx = sub2ind([A,B], P_ind(pidx), jj);
xgrid3 = permute(reshape(xgrdtmp(idx(:),:), [A B D]), [1 3 2]);
t(2) = toc;
Check
check = isequal(xgrid2, xgrid3);
fprintf('Time (old): %f\nTime (new): %f\nEqual: %d\n', t,check);
...
Time (old): 2.325150
Time (new): 0.441705
Equal: 1
0 件のコメント
Nitin Khola
2015 年 11 月 3 日
My understanding is that you want to reshape an array that is of size "CxDxB", xgrid to another array of size "AxDxB". So that you can use "reshape" you need the total number of elements to remain the same i.e. A=C in your case. This implies you will have values repeating (I am assuming A>C). You need to use "repmat" to do it in that particular dimension. Refer to the following documentation for details: http://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/repmat.html http://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/reshape.html
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で Logical についてさらに検索
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!