Alternate form of eval function

4 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
Wiqas Ahmad 2021 年 3 月 18 日
コメント済み: Wiqas Ahmad 2021 年 3 月 18 日
How can I write these two syntaxes in alternate from?
eval(['I',num2str(i),num2str(j),num2str(k),'=','getsiganl(filename1)',';']);
eval(['II',num2str(i),num2str(j),num2str(k),'=','smooth(sum(I',num2str(i),num2str(j),num2str(k),',2)',');']);
1 件のコメント表示非表示 なし
Stephen 2021 年 3 月 18 日
Rather than trying to use an "Alternate form of eval function", you should just write your code using much simpler and much more efficient indexing. Is there a particular reason why you cannot use indexing?

サインインしてコメントする。

採用された回答

Bjorn Gustavsson 2021 年 3 月 18 日
You'll have to learn good programming-habits and utilise the vectorized capabilities of matlab. This looks like a case where you might get away with multi-dimensional arrays - but that would require all your signals to have the same length. The safer option is to store all signals in a cell-array - there everything goes. Perhaps something like this:
I_all{i,j,k} = getsiganl(filename1);
I_all_smooth{i,j,k} = smooth(sum(I_all{i,j,k},2));
I would also suggest changing the indices i, j and k to i1, i2 and i3 - this makes me more comfortable when it comes to which order they should go in indexing and also leaves i and j for the imaginary constant.
HTH
2 件のコメント表示非表示 1 件の古いコメント
Wiqas Ahmad 2021 年 3 月 18 日
@Bjorn Gustavsson Thank you. This is really what I wanted

サインインしてコメントする。

その他の回答 (1 件)

Matt J 2021 年 3 月 18 日
Why not simply
I(i,j,k)=getsiganl(filename1);
II(i,j,k)=smooth(sum(I(i,j,k),2))
Be mindful though that if i,j,k are scalar coordinates, neither the original eval form nor the above make sense.
2 件のコメント表示非表示 1 件の古いコメント
Wiqas Ahmad 2021 年 3 月 18 日
@Matt J I think I have checked this in prior but haven't worked. Anyway I got the right answer. Thank you

サインインしてコメントする。

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by