Visual bag-off-features evalute vs. fitcecoc classification results are very different

1 回表示 (過去 30 日間)
Preetham Manjunatha
Preetham Manjunatha 2017 年 11 月 9 日
コメント済み: ahmed shahin 2021 年 5 月 21 日
Dear All:
I have few questions regarding vision toolbox's visual bags-of-features class. Firstly, I have a feature matrix created using (encode, bagOfFeatures functions) visual-bags-of-words using computer vision toolbox, it is 500 x 14404 (Xtrain = 10793, XVal = 1204 and XTest = 2407 samples). There are 14 classes, target matrix is 14 x 14404 or 14404 X 1 categroical classes. When I use Matlab's default method "evaluate" provided in visual bags-of-words example (I presume it uses multiclass SVM "fitcecoc") to classify the test data I am getting a decent precison/recall values around 75% which is decent for the given dataset. Code snippet is given below:
categoryClassifier = trainImageCategoryClassifier(imdsTrainRandomized, bag_Train_BoFOri);
[confMatTr,knownLabelIdxTr,predictedLabelIdxTr,scoreTr] = evaluate(categoryClassifier,imdsTrainRandomized);
[confMatVl,knownLabelIdxVl,predictedLabelIdxVl,scoreVl] = evaluate(categoryClassifier,imdsValRandomized);
[confMatTs,knownLabelIdxTs,predictedLabelIdxTs,scoreTs] = evaluate(categoryClassifier,imdsTestRandomized);
Whereas, if I use fitcecoc to classify train/test dataset using multiclass SVM. I am getting testing accuracy of only ~9-10%. Precision/recall values less than 8%. Also, I noticed runtime takes less than 3 minutes to train, where I am skeptical about. Below is the multiclass SVM code snippet:
t = templateSVM('KernelFunction','polynomial', 'PolynomialOrder',2);
options = statset('UseParallel',0);
MdlSVM = fitcecoc(Xtrain,Labelstrain, 'Coding','onevsone','Learners',t ,...
'Prior','uniform','Options',options);
isLoss = resubLoss(MdlSVM);
CVSVMModel = crossval(MdlSVM);
FirstModel = CVSVMModel.Trained{1};
yTestSVM = predict(FirstModel,Xtest);
percentErrorsSVM = sum(yTestSVM ~= Labelstest)/numel(Labelstest);
accuracySVM = 1 - percentErrorsSVM
Is there a way we can find the optimal parameters tuned in "evaluate" method? Also, I appreciate if there are any suggestions.
Thanks,
  1 件のコメント
ahmed shahin
ahmed shahin 2021 年 5 月 21 日
i have the same problem if you solved it could you share solution please

サインインしてコメントする。

回答 (0 件)

カテゴリ

Help Center および File ExchangeStatistics and Machine Learning Toolbox についてさらに検索

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by