Replace loop with more efficient procedure to make it faster
4 ビュー (過去 30 日間)
古いコメントを表示
So I'm running this loop:
for n = 1:size(table1)
for m = 1:size(table2)
if table1.WP1(n) == table2.WP1(m) && table1.WP2(n) == table2.WP2(m)
table2.STOPS(n) = table2.STOPS(m);
end
end
end
Which takes really long to process - is there a faster way to do it?
0 件のコメント
採用された回答
Fangjun Jiang
2021 年 8 月 19 日
Would this give you a clue?
t1=1:3;
t2=(1:4)';
flag=(t1==t2)
9 件のコメント
Fangjun Jiang
2021 年 8 月 20 日
The code I provided is for multiple matching. All can be done in one shot without loops.
If you know there is only one match, the double-for loop could be faster. Your need to use "break" (instead of "continue") to break the loop.
But again, it "could" be faster. If the matching one is the last iteration in the double-for loop, then the "break" has no effect.
Peter Perkins
2021 年 9 月 2 日
The double loop is unlikely to be faster for any case. If there is at most one match in table2 for each row of table1, then perhaps ismember would work. But unless these tables are pretty big, the "row == col" strategy is likely to be the fastest.
その他の回答 (0 件)
参考
カテゴリ
Help Center および File Exchange で Loops and Conditional Statements についてさらに検索
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!